A high-performance, fully electrified building.
Central Park reports 5 Star NABERS Energy excluding GreenPower, 6 Star NABERS Indoor Environment and a 6 Green Star rating.
Please rotate your phone
to portrait
This experience is designed for landscape mode.
Central Park has already invested in efficiency, electrification and premium building performance. Sydsol opens the next opportunity: turn the façade into a clean-energy asset that produces electricity directly on the building.
Central Park has already raised the bar on operational performance. Now the building can add something fundamentally different: visible on-site generation from the vertical surfaces surrounding its tenants.
Qualified roof and façade surfaces are screened against the same energy and commercial assumptions used throughout this case study.
Grid-equivalent CO₂ is modelled using the local grid factor. Actual market-based emissions impact depends on the building’s electricity procurement and renewable-energy contracts.
See how electricity generation and equivalent energy cost change through the year as solar resource, orientation and shading shift.
Unlike a single-orientation project, Central Park has meaningful generation across west, northeast, northwest and southwest surfaces. Northeast picks up earlier hours; west and northwest carry more of the afternoon.
No single façade owns the project. The model spreads generation across multiple orientations, which is precisely why the envelope adds value beyond the roof.
Central Park has already raised the bar on operational performance. Now the building can add something fundamentally different: visible on-site generation from the vertical surfaces surrounding its tenants.
Central Park reports 5 Star NABERS Energy excluding GreenPower, 6 Star NABERS Indoor Environment and a 6 Green Star rating.
Façade solar adds a new layer that tenants can see and measure: electricity produced directly on the asset rather than only efficiency gains or renewable procurement.
Central Park’s strong operating performance gives on-site generation a clear role: add new renewable supply directly to an already efficient asset.
Occupiers such as Rio Tinto and Synergy operate in sectors where the energy transition is central to strategy. A productive façade makes that transition tangible in the workplace itself.
West, northeast, northwest and southwest all contribute materially. The broad orientation mix spreads useful façade generation across the day.
A global resources company with a major decarbonisation programme and strong interest in renewable electricity.
For Western Australia’s energy utility, a productive building makes the energy transition visible at the place of work.
A visible building-level project can reach a wider community of member companies and visitors.
External references describe public building, owner and occupier context. Inclusion does not imply endorsement of Sydsol or participation in this study.
Solar Studio reveals the energy potential hidden across an entire building envelope — not just the roof. It combines advanced 3D solar simulation with the commercial metrics asset owners need to make a decision.
We recreate the building and its urban surroundings so the analysis reflects the real geometry of the façade, roof and neighbouring skyline.
Advanced ray-tracing follows sunlight through every hour of the day and every season of the year, revealing how solar access changes across the envelope.
Nearby towers, setbacks and the building itself are captured in a detailed shading profile, separating consistently productive surfaces from those that spend too much time in shadow.
We translate the solar opportunity into generation, energy savings, carbon reduction and payback — turning a complex façade into a clear investment picture.
See where the building can generate, when that energy arrives, and which surfaces create the strongest commercial value.
These inputs define the Central Park Tower case study and can be changed for a building-specific assessment.
Indicative feasibility assessment. Results support early-stage decision making and should be followed by site, structural, electrical and façade-engineering review before project development.
We can turn this model into a site-specific pilot scope — target surfaces, expected generation, integration pathway and indicative economics.